Two sides of the same wing: ventral scales enhance dorsal wing color in the butterfly Speyeria mormonia.

Biological visual signals are often produced by complex interactions between light-absorbing and light-scattering structures, but for many signals, potential interactions between different light-interacting components have yet to be tested. Butterfly wings, for example, are thin enough that their two sides may not be optically isolated. We tested whether ventral wing scales of the Mormon fritillary, Speyeria mormonia, affect the appearance of dorsal orange patches, which are thought to be involved in sexual signaling. Using reflectance spectroscopy, we found that ventral scales, either silvered or non-silvered, make dorsal orange patches significantly brighter, with the silvered scales having the greater effect. Computational modeling indicates that both types of ventral scale enhance the chromatic perceptual signal of dorsal orange patches, with only the silvered scales also enhancing their achromatic perceptual signal. A lack of optical independence between the two sides of the wings of S. mormonia implies that the wing surfaces of butterflies have intertwined signaling functions and evolutionary histories.

Polarization sensitivity and decentralized visual processing in an animal with a distributed visual system.

The marine mollusc Acanthopleura granulata (Mollusca; Polyplacophora) has a distributed visual array composed of hundreds of small image-forming eyes embedded within its eight dorsal shell plates. As in other animals with distributed visual systems, we still have a poor understanding of the visual capabilities of A. granulata and we have yet to learn where and how it processes visual information. Using behavioral trials involving isoluminant looming visual stimuli, we found that A. granulata demonstrates spatial vision with an angular resolution of 6 deg. We also found that A. granulata responds to looming stimuli defined by contrasting angles of linear polarization. To learn where and how A. granulata processes visual information, we traced optic nerves using fluorescent lipophilic dyes. We found that the optic nerves innervate the underlying lateral neuropil, a neural tissue layer that circumnavigates the body. Adjacent optic nerves innervate the lateral neuropil with highly overlapping arborizations, suggesting it is the site of an integrated visuotopic map. Using immunohistochemistry, we found that the lateral neuropil of A. granulata is subdivided into two separate layers. In comparison, we found that a chiton with eyespots (Chiton tuberculatus) and two eyeless chitons (Ischnochiton papillosus and Chaetopleura apiculata) have lateral neuropil that is a singular circular layer without subdivision, findings consistent with previous work on chiton neuroanatomy. Overall, our results suggest that A. granulata effectuates its visually mediated behaviors using a unique processing scheme: it extracts spatial and polarization information using a distributed visual system, and then integrates and processes that information using decentralized neural circuits.

Panoramic spatial vision in the bay scallop Argopecten irradians.

We have a growing understanding of the light-sensing organs and light-influenced behaviours of animals with distributed visual systems, but we have yet to learn how these animals convert visual input into behavioural output. It has been suggested they consolidate visual information early in their sensory-motor pathways, resulting in them being able to detect visual cues (spatial resolution) without being able to locate them (spatial vision). To explore how an animal with dozens of eyes processes visual information, we analysed the responses of the bay scallop Argopecten irradians to both static and rotating visual stimuli. We found A. irradians distinguish between static visual stimuli in different locations by directing their sensory tentacles towards them and were more likely to point their extended tentacles towards larger visual stimuli. We also found that scallops track rotating stimuli with individual tentacles and with rotating waves of tentacle extension. Our results show, to our knowledge for the first time that scallops have both spatial resolution and spatial vision, indicating their sensory-motor circuits include neural representations of their visual surroundings. Exploring a wide range of animals with distributed visual systems will help us learn the different ways non-cephalized animals convert sensory input into behavioural output.

The orbital hoods of snapping shrimp have surface features that may represent tradeoffs between vision and protection.

Snapping shrimp (Alpheidae) are decapod crustaceans named for the snapping claws with which they produce cavitation bubbles. Snapping shrimp use the shock waves released by collapsing cavitation bubbles as weapons. Along with their distinctive claws, snapping shrimp have orbital hoods, extensions of their carapace that cover their heads and eyes. Snapping shrimp view the world through their orbital hoods, so we asked if the surfaces of the orbital hoods of the snapping shrimp Alpheus heterochaelis have features that minimize the scattering of light. Using SEM, we found that surface features, primarily microbial epibionts, covered less space on the surfaces of the orbital hoods of A. heterochaelis (∼18%) than they do elsewhere on the carapace (∼50%). Next, we asked if these surface features influence aerophobicity. By measuring the contact angles of air bubbles, we found the orbital hoods of A. heterochaelis are less aerophobic than other regions of the carapace. Surfaces that are less aerophobic are more likely to have cavitation bubbles adhere to them and are more likely to have shock waves cause new cavitation bubbles to nucleate upon them. Computational modeling indicates the orbital hoods of A. heterochaelis face a functional trade-off: fewer surface features, such as less extensive communities of microbial epibionts, may minimize the scattering of light at the cost of making the adhesion and nucleation of cavitation bubbles more likely.

A snapping shrimp has the fastest vision of any aquatic animal.

Animals use their sensory systems to sample information from their environments. The physiological properties of sensory systems differ, leading animals to perceive their environments in different ways. For example, eyes have different temporal sampling rates, with faster-sampling eyes able to resolve faster-moving scenes. Eyes can also have different dynamic ranges. For every eye, there is a light level below which vision is unreliable because of an insufficient signal-to-noise ratio and a light level above which the photoreceptors are saturated. Here, we report that the eyes of the snapping shrimp Alpheus heterochaelis have a temporal sampling rate of at least 160 Hz, making them the fastest-sampling eyes ever described in an aquatic animal. Fast-sampling eyes help flying animals detect objects moving across their retinas at high angular velocities. A. heterochaelis are fast-moving animals that live in turbid, structurally complex oyster reefs and their fast-sampling eyes, like those of flying animals, may help them detect objects moving rapidly across their retinas. We also report that the eyes of A. heterochaelis have a broad dynamic range that spans conditions from late twilight (approx. 1 lux) to direct sunlight (approx. 100 000 lux), a finding consistent with the circatidal activity patterns of this shallow-dwelling species.

Visual Ecology: Now You See, Now You Don't.

During the day, the brittle star Ophiocoma wendtii demonstrates spatial vision due to a distributed network of extraocular photoreceptors whose fields of view are restricted by chromatophores. At night, these chromatophores contract and O. wendtii loses spatial vision.

Evidence for spatial vision in Chiton tuberculatus, a chiton with eyespots.

To better understand relationships between the structures and functions of the distributed visual systems of chitons, we compare how morphological differences between the light-sensing structures of these animals relate to their visually guided behaviors. All chitons have sensory organs - termed aesthetes - embedded within their protective shell plates. In some species, the aesthetes are interspersed with small, image-forming eyes. In other species, the aesthetes are paired with pigmented eyespots. Previously, we compared the visually influenced behaviors of chitons with aesthetes to those of chitons with both aesthetes and eyes. Here, we characterize the visually influenced behaviors of chitons with aesthetes and eyespots. We find that chitons with eyespots engage in behaviors consistent with spatial vision, but appear to use spatial vision for different tasks than chitons with eyes. Unlike chitons with eyes, Chiton tuberculatus and C. marmoratus fail to distinguish between sudden appearances of overhead objects and equivalent, uniform changes in light levels. We also find that C. tuberculatus orients to static objects with angular sizes as small as 10 deg. Thus, C. tuberculatus demonstrates spatial resolution that is at least as fine as that demonstrated by chitons with eyes. The eyespots of Chiton are smaller and more numerous than the eyes found in other chitons and they are separated by angles of <0.5 deg, suggesting that the light-influenced behaviors of Chiton may be more accurately predicted by the network properties of their distributed visual system than by the structural properties of their individual light-detecting organs.

Expression of G Proteins in the Eyes and Parietovisceral Ganglion of the Bay Scallop Argopecten irradians.

A multitude of image-forming eyes are spread across the bodies of certain invertebrates. Recent efforts have characterized how these eyes function, but less progress has been made toward describing the neural structures associated with them. Scallops, for example, have a distributed visual system that includes dozens of eyes whose optic nerves project to the lateral lobes of the parietovisceral ganglion (PVG). To identify sensory receptors and chemical synapses associated with the scallop visual system, we studied the expression of four G protein α subunits (Gαi, Gαo, Gαq, and Gαs) in the eyes and PVG of the bay scallop Argopecten irradians (Lamarck, 1819). In the eyes of A. irradians, we noted expression of Gαo by the ciliary photoreceptors of the distal retina, expression of Gαq by the rhabdomeric photoreceptors of the proximal retina, and the expression of Gαo and Gαq by the cells of the cornea; we did not, however, detect expression of Gαi or Gαs in the eyes. In the PVG of A. irradians, we noted widespread expression of Gαi, Gαo, and Gαq. The expression of Gαs was limited to fine neurites in the lateral and ventral central lobes, as well as large unipolar neurons in the dorsal central lobes. Our findings suggest that light detection by the eyes of A. irradians is conferred primarily by photoreceptors that express Gαo or Gαq, that the corneal cells of scallops may contain sensory receptors and/or receive neural input, and that G protein labeling is useful for visualizing substructures and identifying specific populations of cells within the nervous systems of invertebrates.